Jump to content
Royal Caribbean Blog

Miami-Dade Mayor requesting meeting with CDC


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Good to see politicians trying to move the needle, but thus far it is clear the CDC does not really care about what any politician says (except perhaps the President, as evidenced last fall with that

The more I look at it, the more ridiculous the CDC ban is. Consider allowing each of the big three cruise lines to sail with two ships right now at 50% capacity.  Use 3,000 per ship as a high num

I thought you were going all Bronx on us for a moment there. 🙂 As for your friends, that's simply the way they're dealing with it that helps them cope.  Some people are serious germaphobes and it'

Posted Images

The more I look at it, the more ridiculous the CDC ban is.

Consider allowing each of the big three cruise lines to sail with two ships right now at 50% capacity.  Use 3,000 per ship as a high number (not all ships are Oasis class).  That is 18,000 guests per week.  Double it to account for secondary brands also sailing with two ships.  That's 36,000 guests per week.

The US population is ~328M.

Those 36k guests equal 0.01% of the US population.  

The CDC is banning a restart that involves 0.01% of the population.  

If allowed to sail and using CDC protocols those 36,000 guests each week would require a PCR test to reach the port and an antigen test to board the ship.  On board they would be subject to protocols established by the CDC as best practices.  Daily temperature check.  More antigen testing.  Masks.  Distancing.  VACCINES!  To debark the ship they need an antigen test.  All of the things that aren't taking place on land in communities around America.

Instead the CDC has decided that it is much better to prevent 36,000 Americans from using CDC best practice protocols each week.

Instead the CDC wants Americans running loose in their home states were the CDC has no jurisdiction and can't control what state or local governments set as requirements.  Many states are opening up.  Many states are letting protocols go.  Yet the CDC thinks this is better for Americans over the CDC's own best practice protocols.

The CDC doesn't want people using their own protocols.

The CDC doesn't want people to be tested.

Given the options facing the CDC, the CDC chooses an option to ban cruise ships and prevent Americans from being tested frequently and using CDC best practice protocols.

How many Americans are we talking about?  Just 0.01% of the population.

All of this for just 0.01% of the population.

Somehow the CDC has determined that stopping 0.01% of the American population from using CDC best practices on a weekly basis will somehow save America.  

The logic and reasoning being used by the CDC defies science and data.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, twangster said:

The more I look at it, the more ridiculous the CDC ban is.

Consider allowing each of the big three cruise lines to sail with two ships right now at 50% capacity.  Use 3,000 per ship as a high number (not all ships are Oasis class).  That is 18,000 guests per week.  Double it to account for secondary brands also sailing with two ships.  That's 36,000 guests per week.

The US population is ~328M.

Those 36k guests equal 0.01% of the US population.  

The CDC is banning a restart that involves 0.01% of the population.  

If allowed to sail and using CDC protocols those 36,000 guests each week would require a PCR test to reach the port and an antigen test to board the ship.  On board they would be subject to protocols established by the CDC as best practices.  Daily temperature check.  More antigen testing.  Masks.  Distancing.  VACCINES!  To debark the ship they need an antigen test.  All of the things that aren't taking place on land in communities around America.

Instead the CDC has decided that it is much better to prevent 36,000 Americans from using CDC best practice protocols each week.

Instead the CDC wants Americans running loose in their home states were the CDC has no jurisdiction and can't control what state or local governments set as requirements.  Many states are opening up.  Many states are letting protocols go.  Yet the CDC thinks this is better for Americans over the CDC's own best practice protocols.

The CDC doesn't want people using their own protocols.

The CDC doesn't want people to be tested.

Given the options facing the CDC, the CDC chooses an option to ban cruise ships and prevent Americans from being tested frequently and using CDC best practice protocols.

How many Americans are we talking about?  Just 0.01% of the population.

All of this for just 0.01% of the population.

Somehow the CDC has determined that stopping 0.01% of the American population from using CDC best practices on a weekly basis will somehow save America.  

The logic and reasoning being used by the CDC defies science and data.  

The logic and reasoning used by the entire country defies science and data for an illness that has taken .1% of the population, the vast majority of which were in bad health anyway.  Wash you hands, don't touch you face, and when the shot is available, get it.  Let us live our lives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife had dinner with a friend this week.  She and her family are so petrified that she has been off her property exactly twice in the last 12 months (both times to have dinner with my wife).  Both parents are working from home.  Their 7 year old is being home schooled.  All groceries are delivered.  The husband has left home a few times when it was absolutely necessary.  Upon return he removes is clothing in the garage, the clothing is put into a trash bag for two weeks before it comes into the house to be laundered, and he sprays down with disinfectant before coming into the house.  Of course all deliveries are handled appropriately too.

What country is this?

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, RCVoyager said:

Sorry, wash YOUR hands and don't touch YOUR face.  I got to typing too fast.

I thought you were going all Bronx on us for a moment there. 🙂

As for your friends, that's simply the way they're dealing with it that helps them cope.  Some people are serious germaphobes and it's a way of coping that allows them to feel as if they have better control of a situation that gives them great anxiety.  I am very close to one myself, and his routines have nothing to do with "this country".  Just continue to be kind.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SpeedNoodles said:

I thought you were going all Bronx on us for a moment there. 🙂

As for your friends, that's simply the way they're dealing with it that helps them cope.  Some people are serious germaphobes and it's a way of coping that allows them to feel as if they have better control of a situation that gives them great anxiety.  I am very close to one myself, and his routines have nothing to do with "this country".  Just continue to be kind.  

I appreciate and agree with your sentiment.  It is a compliment to my wife that the two times she's chosen to leave home in 12 months was to have dinner with her.

I think the "what country is this" portion of my comment was probably related to my own frustration with the situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, RCVoyager said:

My wife had dinner with a friend this week.  She and her family are so petrified that she has been off her property exactly twice in the last 12 months (both times to have dinner with my wife).  Both parents are working from home.  Their 7 year old is being home schooled.  All groceries are delivered.  The husband has left home a few times when it was absolutely necessary.  Upon return he removes is clothing in the garage, the clothing is put into a trash bag for two weeks before it comes into the house to be laundered, and he sprays down with disinfectant before coming into the house.  Of course all deliveries are handled appropriately too.

What country is this?

We still see people grocery shopping wearing what they probably think are great hazmat suits. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to see politicians trying to move the needle, but thus far it is clear the CDC does not really care about what any politician says (except perhaps the President, as evidenced last fall with that alleged tug of war with extending the no sail order).

The fact technical instructions haven't been delivered and it is now March (from when they were supposed to be given in October) is absolutely ridiculous. Talk about not being an honest broker.

The fear that the Conditional Sail Order is the No Sail Order with a different name is accurate, and it is absolutely absurd this has gone on this long.

I'm not saying cruises should  have been able to restart 6 months ago. Just that clearly the cruise lines have demonstrated a lot of self restraint, and they know more than anyone, the importance of operating safely given their very public and media-unfriendly coverage.

If the CDC is willing to say vaccinated people can all hang out and be merry together, explain to me why, at VERY least, those same people can't be hanging out, on a ship, with these multiple layers of precautions that have already been defined.  It really defies logic at this point.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, twangster said:

The more I look at it, the more ridiculous the CDC ban is.

Consider allowing each of the big three cruise lines to sail with two ships right now at 50% capacity.  Use 3,000 per ship as a high number (not all ships are Oasis class).  That is 18,000 guests per week.  Double it to account for secondary brands also sailing with two ships.  That's 36,000 guests per week.

The US population is ~328M.

Those 36k guests equal 0.01% of the US population.  

The CDC is banning a restart that involves 0.01% of the population.  

If allowed to sail and using CDC protocols those 36,000 guests each week would require a PCR test to reach the port and an antigen test to board the ship.  On board they would be subject to protocols established by the CDC as best practices.  Daily temperature check.  More antigen testing.  Masks.  Distancing.  VACCINES!  To debark the ship they need an antigen test.  All of the things that aren't taking place on land in communities around America.

Instead the CDC has decided that it is much better to prevent 36,000 Americans from using CDC best practice protocols each week.

Instead the CDC wants Americans running loose in their home states were the CDC has no jurisdiction and can't control what state or local governments set as requirements.  Many states are opening up.  Many states are letting protocols go.  Yet the CDC thinks this is better for Americans over the CDC's own best practice protocols.

The CDC doesn't want people using their own protocols.

The CDC doesn't want people to be tested.

Given the options facing the CDC, the CDC chooses an option to ban cruise ships and prevent Americans from being tested frequently and using CDC best practice protocols.

How many Americans are we talking about?  Just 0.01% of the population.

All of this for just 0.01% of the population.

Somehow the CDC has determined that stopping 0.01% of the American population from using CDC best practices on a weekly basis will somehow save America.  

The logic and reasoning being used by the CDC defies science and data.  

The CDC has probably done a good job of trying to understand the science and guess at what we should be doing (I'm being charitable) ..

What they have done a god awful job of is then trying to explain it to the general public in a why that gets the public on board with doing the "right" thing ... at this point they are rapidly reaching the point of being ignored and over ridden (I'm right there with you on your opinion).

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, RCVoyager said:

My wife had dinner with a friend this week.  She and her family are so petrified that she has been off her property exactly twice in the last 12 months (both times to have dinner with my wife).  Both parents are working from home.  Their 7 year old is being home schooled.  All groceries are delivered.  The husband has left home a few times when it was absolutely necessary.  Upon return he removes is clothing in the garage, the clothing is put into a trash bag for two weeks before it comes into the house to be laundered, and he sprays down with disinfectant before coming into the house.  Of course all deliveries are handled appropriately too.

What country is this?

not the kind of thing that is happening in the Midwest.  Maybe someone rare but the vast majority of people are going about there business and just masking up.  All out stores set up 20-30 parking paces for pick-up but I hardly ever see anyone in them when either driving by or when going to shop.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/19/2021 at 7:33 PM, steverk said:

The cdc has never felt this much power in its existence. I hope they come to their senses, but I think it has gone to their heads. 😪

The fact they are the primary controlling agency over US passenger cruise industry is nuts!  They have a stake, but long term primary responsibility needs to be removed from this agency.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's complicated. Twangster has nailed the details down, I'll try to recall them. The US Government has declared a public health emergency. That grants US government agencies varying degrees of lawful authority to do certain things. The CDC issued a no-sail-order for certain ships (including those of the cruise lines operating ships with > 250 passengers) from US ports based on the emergency declaration.

Certain Maritime laws are being invoked and the US Treasury Department which contains the US Coast Guard would be charged with enforcement of those laws. Various documents, enumerated in the Maritime laws that must be approved by port authorities are required for a cruise ship to enter or leave a US port. Port authorities would deny approval of the required documents. 

I've offered that the cruise lines should collectively sue in an appropriate court seeking an injunction preventing enforcement of the no-sail-order. I looked briefly at the law that might apply after a trade group for the travel industry threated to do just that in October. I'm not a lawyer but it doesn't take one to see that a jurisdictional issue exists and that the government lawyers that crafted the no-sail-order did a surprisingly good job of making it very hard for the cruise industry to ignore the order or sue. 

Twangster, jump in here if I've erred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My confusion is that it seems that in every other aspect (air travel and all inclusives etc) they’ve issued ‘advisories’  which don’t seem to be being enforced but they have full power over the cruise industry. I’m just wondering how the one side is simply advisories and the other side is full control.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, a lot us here among many others are asking the same question. It is, IMO, clearly discriminatory.

Think back to March of 2020 when the pandemic was making itself known and governments were scrambling to "do something." The visuals of the Diamond Princess fiasco and the problems with cruise ships at sea being denied access to ports world wide were ugly. A convenient move by the US government to stop foreign flagged cruise lines from binging pestilence and death to US shores made it appear like the CDC was doing it's job to protect the US public health. IOW, there was a political calculation to the order. Made the US and the CDC, before the pandemic crisis, viewed as the world's leader in disease prevention and control, look good. 

If my memory serves me, President Trump, at the time of the CDC issued no-sail-order, did not want to shutter US airports. Those remained open and the airline industry added new safety protocols. The US government left other mitigation measures up to the states. That resulted in the crazy patch-work of mitigation measures you see today from state to state and even county to county.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at the CDC Director's session in front of a senate committee on March 18 it seems even the CDC is confused.

They are now claiming it's not the CDC that is holding up a restart.  It's some other agency or agencies.

https://www.cruisehive.com/worrying-answers-from-cdc-director-on-conditional-sailing-order/48435

  • “This is an inter-agency decision, it is not a decision solely up to the CDC so I would be remiss if I would do that by myself because the decision is not solely up to us.”

When pressed:

  • "I believe the department of transportation and there are numerous others making these decisions”

Any parent who has come into a room to find a broken vase or lamp on the floor has faced this at some point.

"Who broke the lamp?"

Im Not GIF

 

The CDC created the CSO banning cruise ships from sailing but now they are powerless to revoke or change it.  It's up to some other agency.  Hmmm.

Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, twangster said:

If you look at the CDC Director's session in front of a senate committee on March 18 it seems even the CDC is confused.

They are now claiming it's not the CDC that is holding up a restart.  It's some other agency or agencies.

https://www.cruisehive.com/worrying-answers-from-cdc-director-on-conditional-sailing-order/48435

  • “This is an inter-agency decision, it is not a decision solely up to the CDC so I would be remiss if I would do that by myself because the decision is not solely up to us.”

When pressed:

  • "I believe the department of transportation and there are numerous others making these decisions”

Any parent who has come into a room to find a broken vase or lamp on the floor has faced this at some point.

"Who broke the lamp?"

Im Not GIF

 

The CDC created the CSO banning cruise ships from sailing but now they are powerless to revoke or change it.  It's up to some other agency.  Hmmm.

Great link! Typical bureaucratic buffoonery - "no one in-charge".  Who grants the operational certificates?  Petition the signatory/  Seems like port cities/states and cruise lines could have standing to bring a suite against DOT or "whoever".   After all - hotels, resorts, and airlines are all operating under Covid conditions, so there is a level of discrimination against a specific travel industry player.    Cruise ships are just floating hotels.   Would argue DOT (cabinet level) is the right level of organization to make an executive decision for sign-off.  Its all about accepting risk mitigation strategies.  Are  hotels requiring tests or vaccination in order to accept guests?  International airfare requires tests - OK, cruise lines are starting with tests and vaccinations.  Can't beat that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do federal-level government risk acceptance (or, more often NON-acceptance) for a living and I know OH TOO WELL the "not my responsibility" mentality.  The government is all-too-quick to implement all manner of regulations and controls and then once the controls and mitigations are verified and validated, nobody will touch the "residual" risk (an outdated term that we no longer use...but still descriptive enough for our purposes) that remains. There is no such thing as a "safe" operation or process.  There will always be some level of risk remaining, even after everything that can be done, has been done.  Everyone wants to be in charge when the risk is low or when it's time to bring the hammer down somewhere, but when it's time to accept responsibility, the remaining risk is an orphan.  This hot potato will be thrown around for a while until someone is left without a chair (yes, I realize that's a mixed metaphor).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...