Chili Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 Apparently the new administration is focusing on foreign owned and flagged ships. Theres talk on excess port charges on foreign ships visiting U.S ports. It’s rumoured they are mainly looking at Chinese container ships but cruise ships are involved. One of the figures getting around in $1 million and as high as 1.5 million will be placed on cosco container ships visiting U.S. ports. Has anyone heard anything about cruise ships? Quote
smokeybandit Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 I'd be shocked if cruise ships are ever affected. I'd also be shocked if that kind of tariff was placed on a cargo ship since that's basically how much revenue a ship makes per trip anyway. Baked Alaska 1 Quote
KWofPerth Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 35 minutes ago, smokeybandit said: I'd be shocked if cruise ships are ever affected. I'd also be shocked if that kind of tariff was placed on a cargo ship since that's basically how much revenue a ship makes per trip anyway. I wouldn't be much shocked by anything at this point. SplashOfWater, PhillyLady, RestingBird and 4 others 7 Quote
KWofPerth Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 50 minutes ago, Chili said: Apparently the new administration is focusing on foreign owned and flagged ships. Theres talk on excess port charges on foreign ships visiting U.S ports. It’s rumoured they are mainly looking at Chinese container ships but cruise ships are involved. One of the figures getting around in $1 million and as high as 1.5 million will be placed on cosco container ships visiting U.S. ports. Has anyone heard anything about cruise ships? Sydney might start looking like an attractive proposition to send a few extra ships to. Quote
Chili Posted March 11 Author Report Posted March 11 42 minutes ago, smokeybandit said: I'd be shocked if cruise ships are ever affected. I'd also be shocked if that kind of tariff was placed on a cargo ship since that's basically how much revenue a ship makes per trip anyway. There seems to be a lot of shocking things happening lately. Pooch, TexanTwoStep, PhillyLady and 2 others 4 1 Quote
Chili Posted March 11 Author Report Posted March 11 4 minutes ago, KWofPerth said: Sydney might start looking like an attractive proposition to send a few extra ships to. That’s what I was thinking. KWofPerth 1 Quote
JimnKathy Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 This has nothing to due with cruising, as the news story you're discussing pertains only to Chinese cargo ships. The mods need to delete this thread. Jjohnb 1 Quote
Matt Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 12 hours ago, Chili said: Has anyone heard anything about cruise ships? There was this comment a few weeks ago concerning cruises: https://www.royalcaribbeanblog.com/2025/02/20/trump-official-says-cruise-ships-dont-pay-taxes Jjohnb, Gilley, Chili and 1 other 3 1 Quote
Chili Posted March 11 Author Report Posted March 11 7 hours ago, Matt said: There was this comment a few weeks ago concerning cruises: https://www.royalcaribbeanblog.com/2025/02/20/trump-official-says-cruise-ships-dont-pay-taxes I didn’t realise ships had to be built in the U.S to have the flag. Quote
steverk Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 1 hour ago, Chili said: I didn’t realise ships had to be built in the U.S to have the flag. Yep. That's why it took so long to finally Dispose of the SS United States. There were several cruise lines interested in recommissioning her as the last of the US built ocean liners afloat. I guess none of them really worked out. WAAAYTOOO and Chili 1 1 Quote
Doug_Texas Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 @Matt provides a nice overview of the 1886 Passenger Vessel Services Act. I agree with the comments from the administration that this should be repealed and U.S. companies should be able to re-enter ship building activities if they are interested in the investment. It certainly seems like ship building locations like Finland are not places with low cost labor. The 1886 legislation needs to go. The Norwegian bucket of bolts “Pride of America” is the only U.S. flagged ocean cruise ship that doesn’t need to visit a foreign port and that is deeply regretful. steverk 1 Quote
smokeybandit Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 PVSA still has its place, just needs to be modernized. Matt and JasonOasis 2 Quote
PhillyLady Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 Reading about all the Alaska cruise discussions in the news today: potential bills to avoid Canadian ports, and Canada adding tolls to American trucks and all trying to access Alaska. Potentially Canada could even deny land access to Alaska. For all those who drink alcohol, I also see 200% increased tariffs threatened on European alcohol! Yes, cruising will be affected by trade wars. WAAAYTOOO 1 Quote
BB1 Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 I think it's great news. I'm sure a lot of people enjoy stopping in Canada but I would love extra time in Alaska instead. I think this is totally positive for cruising as the cruise lines would have a choice and so would cruisers. You could chose a cruise that stops in Canada or go straight to Alaska. WAAAYTOOO 1 Quote
smokeybandit Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 I'd be quite surprised if that bill goes anywhere. There will be tons of shots across the bow by both sides, but in the end it'll be just another game that no one wins or loses. WAAAYTOOO and Pattycruise 2 Quote
BB1 Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 You might be correct but it would sure be nice to get extra days in Alaska. I guess we'll just have to wait and see. Quote
Chili Posted March 14 Author Report Posted March 14 1 hour ago, PhillyLady said: Reading about all the Alaska cruise discussions in the news today: potential bills to avoid Canadian ports, and Canada adding tolls to American trucks and all trying to access Alaska. Potentially Canada could even deny land access to Alaska. For all those who drink alcohol, I also see 200% increased tariffs threatened on European alcohol! Yes, cruising will be affected by trade wars. But they are not really American ships so the shouldn’t attract Canada’s Levies. Quote
steverk Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 I don't think this is good news, but some good may come from it. Perhaps this will finally trigger the end of the PVSA. Can anyone say "Hawaii cruises?" Quote
Gilley Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 Oh my, I didn't think about the alcohol on the ships. The Beverage package is high enough. Thank goodness for Diamond status. Quote
Doug_Texas Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 On 3/12/2025 at 5:20 PM, smokeybandit said: PVSA still has its place, just needs to be modernized. Enlighten me, what is a useful provision in that law? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.