Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hmm - is there an additional source for this? The site you shared is the only site reporting that based on my quick (non-professional) Google Search. 

What would that mean for tourists? Would tour operators stop taking snorkelers there? What's the risk associated?

Posted
15 minutes ago, klaconqueso said:

Hmm - is there an additional source for this? The site you shared is the only site reporting that based on my quick (non-professional) Google Search. 

What would that mean for tourists? Would tour operators stop taking snorkelers there? What's the risk associated?

It's not posted as a public notice on the http://dpnr.vi.gov/environmental-protection/public-notices/ which is the quoted source of the information in the article, so perhaps the contamination has been resolved?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...