SapGuy

Thanks to everyone who provided feedback. From other posts in various online groups, it sounds like there are multiple people who have booked what we did. Sounds like there is even confusion in the RCCL call center on the policy. According to a post on a FB group, rumor is RCCL is investigating the option for anyone getting on in Hawaii and wanting to continue on the 7-day Alaska cruise to get off one stop early in Victoria, BC instead of Seattle to make the cruise "legal". Yeah, I know it's a hail mary - but fingers crossed.

Thank you for the explanation. To clarify other's questions - yes, our intenerary has us contining immediately continuing on to Alaska on the very next cruise out of Vancouver. The "interesting" thing is the Hawaii leg is scheduled to arrive in Vancouver on April 29th at 3am. The ship's departure doesn't occur until the following morning (April 30th) at 3am. Seems like a reach, but one might wonder if this is RCCL's attempt to legalize the voyage? The weird thing is our TA booked this over two months ago and it wasn't flagged by RCCL. Given the fines they would incurr, seems like something computers should report on?

I'm hoping someone can get me an answer as it's not super clear - and my travel agent can't get me an answer until Monday. My fiance and I am booked on the 2024 Quantum realignment cruise from Hawaii to Vancouver, and then the 7 day Vancover-Alaska-Seattle the following week (our honeymoon). We are seeing things on Facebook that seems to indicate this will violate Passenger Vehicle Service Act (PVSA) rules. I'm struggling to understand if we (a) fully pack our luggage and disembark and (b) change cabins, why couldn't the B2B cruise becaus legal two seperately?